Is phonetic target uniformity phonologically, or sociolinguistically grounded?

Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019

Author

Josef Fruehwald

Published

2019

Abstract

In this paper, I investigate to what degree phonetic uniformity in diachronic vowels shifts can be accounted for in terms of a shared phonetic implementation rule of phonological features [6, 10], versus a shared social evaluation of the phonetic realizations [19]. I take a particular focus on the parallel fronting and subsequent retraction of the GOOSE, GOAT and MOUTH vowels, as well as the raising of the preconsonantal FACE and pre-voiceless PRICE vowels in Philadelphia, drawing data from the Philadelphia Neighborhood Corpus [15]. Using generalized additive models [21] I ﬁt models for these vowels accounting for gender, date of birth, educational attainment, and vowel duration using tensor product smooths. Looking at the correlation of the byspeaker random intercepts, back vowel fronting appears to be highly correlated, thus likely phonologically grounded, while FACE and PRICE raising is not, thus likely socially grounded.

Citation

BibTeX citation:

@article{fruehwald2019,
  author = {Fruehwald, Josef},
  title = {Is Phonetic Target Uniformity Phonologically, or
    Sociolinguistically Grounded?},
  journal = {Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic
    Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019},
  pages = {5},
  date = {2019},
  url = {https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_730.pdf},
  langid = {en},
  abstract = {In this paper, I investigate to what degree phonetic
    uniformity in diachronic vowels shifts can be accounted for in terms
    of a shared phonetic implementation rule of phonological features
    {[}6, 10{]}, versus a shared social evaluation of the phonetic
    realizations {[}19{]}. I take a particular focus on the parallel
    fronting and subsequent retraction of the GOOSE, GOAT and MOUTH
    vowels, as well as the raising of the preconsonantal FACE and
    pre-voiceless PRICE vowels in Philadelphia, drawing data from the
    Philadelphia Neighborhood Corpus {[}15{]}. Using generalized
    additive models {[}21{]} I ﬁt models for these vowels accounting for
    gender, date of birth, educational attainment, and vowel duration
    using tensor product smooths. Looking at the correlation of the
    byspeaker random intercepts, back vowel fronting appears to be
    highly correlated, thus likely phonologically grounded, while FACE
    and PRICE raising is not, thus likely socially grounded.}
}

For attribution, please cite this work as:

Fruehwald, Josef. 2019. “Is Phonetic Target Uniformity Phonologically, or Sociolinguistically Grounded?” Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, 5. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_730.pdf.